DOES DEFENDING INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY MEAN SUPPORTING EVIL.

11 Apr 2022, 16:24
DOES DEFENDING INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY MEAN SUPPORTING EVIL? Some government and annexed agencies have managed to convince many individuals that cryptography and in particular E2E cryptography and individual privacy in general is bad for our societies and a risk factor for our safety. Their mantra is "We need to know everything we want about you, all the time, in order to keep you and your loved ones safe". Is this mantra actually based on facts? There are many like us that argue it's based more on ideology and false assumptions than properly proven facts. Here's a fully referenced short video, in addition to few other articles and documentaries we previously posted, like Coded Bias, The Social Dilemma, Social Cooling and the excellent article from James Wendland ("Privacy Is a Collective Concern"), that you might not want to miss. With that said, we also need to remember that PIVX does actually have user-controlled options for when some info needs to be disclosed while maintaining 100% privacy whenever it's needed (see this article for more in depth explanation). #PIVXNews

Same news in other sources

2
Wanchain
WanchainWAN #767
Telegram
11 Apr 2022, 16:29
telegram news 11 April 2022 16:29
https://twitter.com/wanchain_org/status/1513554603442417673
Wanchain
WanchainWAN #767
Telegram
11 Apr 2022, 16:29
telegram news 11 April 2022 16:29
https://twitter.com/wanchain_org/status/1513554603442417673